4.7 Article

Effect of cigarette smoking on prefrontal cortical function in nondeprived smokers performing the stroop task

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 1421-1428

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301272

关键词

fMRI; tobacco; nicotine; attention; brain imaging; prefrontal cortex

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR 00865, M01 RR000865] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA020872, R01 DA014093, T32 DA007272, T32 DA 07272, R01 DA015059-04, R01 DA020872-02, R01 DA015059] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000865] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA014093, T32DA007272, R01DA020872, R01DA015059] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some reports indicate that cigarette smoking can help smokers focus attention, even when they have not abstained from smoking for a substantial period of time (eg, > 1 h). Understanding the mechanisms by which smoking affects attention may help in designing smoking cessation treatments. Thirteen nonsmokers and nine smokers participated in two tests of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). During fMRI, the participants performed the Stroop Task. There was a 15-min break between the two tests. During the break, each smoker smoked one cigarette. For smokers, the first test began 45-60 min after the last cigarette of ad libitum smoking. The differences in BOLD signal changes between Stroop conditions (ie, incongruent minus congruent) showed a group x test interaction in the right precentral sulcus, including the putative human frontal eye field (FEF). Smokers, but not nonsmokers, showed greater changes ( relative to rest) in BOLD signal in the incongruent than in the congruent condition in the first fMRI test but not in the second. Even after brief abstinence from smoking, therefore, smokers exhibit compromised functional efficiency in the right FEF and adjacent precentral sulcus in a test of selective attention; and smoking ameliorates this condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据