4.5 Article

Under-expression of VHL and over-expression of HDAC-1, HIF-1 alpha, LL-37, and IAP-2 in affected skin biopsies of patients with psoriasis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 239-246

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2006.02962.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background A feature of psoriasis is the rapid proliferation of keratinocytes, during which apoptosis is blocked and angiogenesis starts. It is known that tumor hypoxic cells produce histone deacetylase-1 (HDAC-1), which up-regulates hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) and down-regulates von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) protein by up-regulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression. It has been reported recently that the porcine peptide PR39 (homologous to human LL-37) has angiogenic and antiapoptotic activity. Thus, LL-37, induced by insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), could help in the production of VEGF. PR39 also induces the expression of inhibitor of apoptosis protein-2 (IAP-2), which blocks apoptosis. The purpose of this work was to analyze whether these genes and their proteins are expressed in psoriatic biopsies. Methods Using semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and immunohistochemical staining, we studied VHL, IAP-2, and related genes in skin biopsies from psoriatic patients and healthy subjects. Results An over-expression of the mRNA for HDAC-1, HIF-1 alpha, LL-37, and IGF-1 in psoriatic skin, in comparison with skin from healthy subjects, was found. The antiangiogenic VHL mRNA and protein were under-expressed in psoriatic skin and highly expressed in healthy skin. The antiapoptotic IAP-2 was over-expressed in dermal endothelial cells from psoriatic skin. The pro-apoptotic Bax, Fas, and FasL mRNAs were expressed. Conclusions These findings suggest that there could be an association of HDAC-1, HIF-1 alpha, LL-37, VHL, and IAP-2 with angiogenic and apoptotic mechanisms in psoriasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据