4.2 Article

Timing of breeding, peak food availability, and effects of mismatch on chick growth in birds nesting in the High Arctic

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 90, 期 8, 页码 961-971

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/Z2012-064

关键词

phenology; mismatch; shorebirds; arthropods; Tipulidae

类别

资金

  1. Fonds Quebecois de recherche sur la nature et les technologies (FQRNT)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Garfield Weston Award for Northern Research
  4. ArcticNet
  5. Northern Ecosystem Initiatives
  6. International Polar Year Project ArcticWOLVES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In seasonal environments, breeding events must be synchronized with resource peaks to ensure production and growth of offspring. As changes in climate may affect trophic levels differentially, we hypothesized that a lack of synchrony between chick hatch and resource peaks could decrease growth rates in chicks of shorebirds nesting in the High Arctic. To test this hypothesis, we compared growth curves of chicks hatching in synchrony with peak periods of food abundance to those hatching outside of these peak periods. We also tested for changes in lay dates of shorebirds in the Canadian Arctic using recent and historical data. Mean daily temperatures during the laying period increased since the 1950s by up to 1.5 degrees C, and changes in lay dates were apparent for three shorebird species, yet differences in median lay dates between 1954 and 2005-2008 were only significant for White-romped Sandpiper (Calidris fuscicollis (Viellot, 1819)). During 2005-2008, there was only 1 year of relatively high synchrony between hatch and resource peaks. Asynchrony between hatch and peaks in Tipulidae biomass reduced growth rates in chicks of Baird's Sandpiper (Calidris bairdii (Coues, 1861)). As anticipated changes in climate may decouple phenological events, the effects of asynchrony on growth rates of arctic-nesting birds warrant further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据