4.7 Article

Central nervous system-directed AAV2/5-mediated gene therapy synergizes with bone marrow transplantation in the murine model of globoid-cell leukodystrophy

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 44-52

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300026

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 57586] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS43205] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK057586] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS043205, R56NS043205] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Globoid-cell leukodystrophy (GLD) is a rapidly progressing inherited neurodegenerative disorder caused by a deficiency in galactosylceramidase activity. Previous studies in the murine model of GLD ( Twitcher mouse) have shown that both bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and central nervous system (CNS)-directed gene therapy can be moderately effective at ameliorating certain aspects of GLD. As BMT and CNS-directed gene therapy target fundamentally different tissues, we tested the hypothesis that combining these disparate therapies would be more efficacious than either therapy alone. Mice receiving myeloreductive conditioning at birth followed by syngeneic BMT had approximately 25-35% donor chimerism. Untreated Twitcher mice, Twitcher mice treated with BMT alone, AAV2/5 alone, or a combination of BMT and AAV2/5 had mean lifespans of 39, 44, 49, and 104 days, respectively. Twitcher mice treated with a combination of BMT and AAV2/5 also had significantly improved performance in several behavioral tests and greater reduction in demyelination, astrocytosis, and macrophage infiltration compared to untreated Twitcher mice or mice that received either therapy alone. These data suggest that CNS-directed gene therapy synergizes with BMT. The combination of these disparate therapeutic approaches may form the basis for more effective treatment of this inherited neurodegenerative disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据