4.6 Article

The effect of homocysteine reduction by B-vitamin supplementation on inflammatory markers

期刊

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.021

关键词

C-reactive protein; homocysteine; interleukin-6; interleukin-8; monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; vitamins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hyperhomocysteinemia has been associated with vascular disease in many epidemiological studies. However, the pathophysiology is unclear. It is postulated that increased levels of homocysteine induce an inflammatory response in endothelial cells, mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. The aim of this study was to investigate whether plasma concentrations of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, C-reactive protein, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 are increased with higher plasma homocysteine concentrations and whether decreasing homocysteine by vitamin supplementation decreases the concentration of these markers. Methods: Plasma homocysteine, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, C-reactive protein, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 concentrations were measured in 230 volunteers before and after 8 weeks of multivitamin supplementation (folic acid, B-6, and B-12). Results: At baseline, plasma homocysteine concentration was weakly associated with interleukin-8, but not with interleukin-6, C-reactive protein or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Vitamin supplementation resulted in a significant decrease in homocysteine concentration, but no effect on interleukin-6, interleukin-8, C-reactive protein or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 was observed. Conclusions: At baseline homocysteine was only weakly correlated with interleukin-8, but not with interleukin-6, C-reactive protein or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Vitamin supplementation affected homocysteine concentration, but not cytokine levels. The hypothesis that hyperhomocysteinemia increases arteriosclerotic or thrombotic risk through vascular inflammation was not supported by this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据