4.5 Article

Effects of the estrogen agonist 17 beta-estradiol and antagonist tamoxifen in a partial life-cycle assay with zebrafish (Danio rerio)

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 92-99

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1897/06-092R1.1

关键词

zebrafish; endocrine disruption; estrogen; tamoxifen; histopathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A partial life-cycle assay (PLC) with zebrafish (Danio rerio) was conducted to identify endocrine-disrupting effects of 17 beta-estradiol (E-2) and tamoxifen (TMX) as reference for estrogen agonist and antagonist activity. Adult zebrafish were exposed for 21 d and offspring for another 42 d, allowing differentiation of gonads in control animals. The assessed end points included reproductive variables (egg production, fertilization. and hatching). gonad differentiation of juveniles. histopathology, and vitellogenin (VTG) expression. With E-2 the most sensitive end points were feminization of offspring (at 0.1 nM) and increased VTG production in mates (at 0.32 nM). At 1 nM decreased F-1 survival, increased F-1 body length and weight, VTG-related edema and kidney lesions, and inhibited spermatogenesis were observed. Oocyte atresia occurred at even higher concentrations. Exposure to TMX resulted in specific effects at an intermediate test concentration (87 nM), including oocyte atresia with granulosa cell transformation and disturbed spermatogenesis (asynchrony within cysts). In F-1. decreased hatching, Survival, and body weight and length as well as decreased feminization were observed. Decreased vitellogenesis and egg production in females and clustering of Leydig cells in males occurred at higher concentrations. Toxicological profiles of estrogen agonists and antagonists are complex and specific; a valid and refined characterization of endocrine activity of field samples therefore can be obtained only by using a varied set of end points, including histology. as applied in the presented PLC. Evaluation of only a single end point can easily produce under- or overestimation of the actual hazard.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据