4.4 Article

Role of amniotic membrane graft for ocular chemical and thermal injuries

期刊

CORNEA
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 21-26

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802b4201

关键词

amniotic membrane transplantation; chemical eye injury; chemical burn; ocular surface reconstruction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate the results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) for ocular surface reconstruction in chemical and thermal injuries. Methods: Retrospective review of case records of patients who had undergone AMT for chemical injuries (January 1998 to May 2001). Results: Seventy two eyes of 69 patients were studied of which 24 were acute cases (median-2 days, range, 1-20 days) and 48 were chronic cases (median-12.4 months, range, 1.02-95.8 months). Mean age was 22.4 years (SD +/- 13.34 years) and average follow up duration was 7.8 months (SD +/- 7.1). Main clinical findings were symblephara (52.8%), corneal vascularization (51.3%), conjunctivalization (45.8%), Limbal ischemia (45.8%), Limbal stem cell deficiency (55.5%) and epithelial defect (48.6%). 18 cases were due to acid injuries (5 acute, 13 chronic), 52 were due to alkali (18 acute and 34 chronic) and 2 cases were due to thermal burns (1 each acute and chronic). Overall success rate was 87.5% in acute cases and 72.9% in chronic cases. Indication-wise success rates were 94.3% for epithelial defect healing, 88.2% for symptomatic relief, 59.7% for ocular surface reconstruction, and 55% for improving limbal stem cell function. Success was not achieved in any outcome measure in 1/24 (4.2%) in acute group and 6/48 (12.5%) in chronic group. Conclusion: AMT helps in ocular surface reconstruction, promotes rapid epithelial healing and partially restores limbal stem cell function. It can be considered as an effective modality for the ocular surface restoration in chemical and thermal injuries in selected cases. Success rates in acute and chronic cases are comparable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据