4.2 Review

Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil science: A literature review

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 1-20

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.4141/CJSS06027

关键词

X-ray computed tomography; energy level; spatial resolution; segmentation; soil mineral and organic constituents; soil physical and hydro-physical properties; soil biota

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of the spatial configuration of soil, in its complexity, requires an understanding of the interrelations and interactions between the diverse soil constituents, at various levels of organization. Investigations of the spatial arrangement of the mineral and organic components of soil have benefited from the development of techniques for structural analysis. X-ray computed tomography (CT) is a non-destructive and non-invasive technique that has been successfully used for three-dimensional (3D) examination of soil. Valuable information has been obtained by the application of CT for the description and quantitative measurements of soil structure elements, especially of soil pores and pore network features. In many studies, X-ray CT has been used to investigate the hydro-physical characteristics of the soil, in a functional and temporal manner. A dynamic approach has also been utilized in the evaluation of the biotic factor influence on soil. The analysis of soil solid phases, by X-ray CT, has been challenging due to the similar X-ray attenuation of different solid constituents. However, the use of multiple X-ray energy levels has facilitated the discrimination of minerals in soil. The aim of this review and synthesis is to offer a perspective on the major issues related to application of the technique, general attempted solutions and possible directions in the utilization of X-ray CT in soil research. Relevant scanning parameters, procedures for CT image reconstruction, algorithms for the quantification of soil characteristics and results are presented for each type of application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据