4.3 Article

Remotely sensed estimation of cropland in China: a comparison of the maps derived from four global land cover datasets

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 467-479

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.5589/m08-059

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA12Z103, 2006AA120101]
  3. National Key Technologies RD Program [2007BAC03A10]
  4. Foundation for National Non-Profit Scientific Institution, Ministry of Finance of China [IARRP-2008-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four satellite-derived global land cover datasets with 1 km(2) pixel resolution are currently freely available: the University of Maryland Dataset (UMD), the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme Data and Information System Cover (IGBP-DISCover), the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) dataset, and the Global Land Cover 2000 (GLC2000). Although produced primarily for global applications, these global land cover datasets are often used for national or regional applications. The objective of this study was to examine the similarities and differences between these datasets in mapping Chinese cropland and to highlight their strengths and weaknesses when used at the national and regional scales. First, the total areas (in ha) of the cropland mapped by the four datasets were compared at the Chinese national, regional, and provincial levels. Second, we performed a pixel-by-pixel comparison of the spatial locations of cropland mapped by the four datasets. These datasets were then separately compared with the Chinese 1996 National Land Survey Dataset (NLSD-1996) to assess their accuracy in cropland mapping. The results show that, despite some agreement, there are discrepancies between the datasets, and the type and extent varies between regions. There are many reasons for the discrepancies, the main ones being the diverse land cover classification schemes, coarse spatial resolution, per-pixel classification approach, and landscape heterogeneity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据