4.2 Article

Perturbation of lignin biosynthesis pathway in Brassica napus (canola) plants using RNAi

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE
卷 89, 期 3, 页码 441-453

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.4141/CJPS08164

关键词

Brassica napus; cruciferin; lignin; COMT; RNAi

资金

  1. Canadian Crop Genomics Initiative, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bhinu, V.-S., Li, R., Huang, J., Kaminskyj, S., Sharpe, A. and Hannoufa, A. 2009. Perturbation of lignin biosynthesis pathway in Brassica napus (canola) plants using RNAi. Can. J. Plant Sci. 89: 441-453. Brassica napus meal contains high levels of lignin, which is one of the most important compositional factors affecting feed utilization by ruminants. We attempted to modify the concentration and composition of lignin in B. napus plants using the RNAi approach. Four genes were targeted for silencing by this approach either independently or in combination; caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H); coumarate 3-hydroxylase (C3H); ferulic acid 5-hydroxylase (F5H). We successfully developed transgenic B. napus lines expressing CaMV35S:C3H-C4H RNAi, CaMV35S:F5H-COMT RNAi, and Cruciferin:COMT RNAi that contained up to 40% less seed lignin in the transgenic seeds compared to the control. Despite successfully achieving Suppression of these lignin biosynthesis genes and reduction in lignin content in B. napus seeds, we observed minor phenotypic effects on the transgenic plants. In lines carrying the cruciferin: COMT RNAi construct we observed a decrease in lignin content (40%) in the seed and anatomical variations when stem sections were examined. While our silencing had no major negative effect on plant growth it resulted in deformation of vessel elements, and minor changes in S-units. Taken together, these results clearly show that by employing RNAi strategy, it is possible to alter seed lignin content and composition in a manner non-detrimental to B. napus plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据