4.3 Article

Effects of raloxifene treatment on the phenotype of blood monocytes

期刊

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/Y10-002

关键词

monocytes; raloxifene; CD14; CD62-L; phenotype

资金

  1. ISPPC-CHU de Charleroi
  2. Institut de recherche en pathologie et genetique (IRSPG) in Gosselies, Belgium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Raloxifene (RLX), a selective oestrogen receptor modulator, has oestrogen-agonist effects on hone, lipoproteins. and homocysteine and oestrogen-antagonist activity in the breast and uterus, positioning it as a potential drug for long-term prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. To further evaluate its influence on cardiovascular risk factors, we studied the effects of 60 mg/day RLX on serum lipid levels, inflammatory (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and coagulation (fibrinogen) markers, monocytes, and fibrinolysis in 15 healthy postmenopausal women. Markers were measured at baseline, after 1 month without treatment, and after 3 months of treatment. Fibrinolysis was evaluated using the euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT) determined with a new semiautomatic optical method. Monocyte phenotype was determined by measurement of the expression of the antigens CD14, HLA-DR, and CD62-L using flow cytometry. After 3 months of RLX treatment, we observed a decrease in total cholesterol (p = 0.002), in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001). and in lipoprotein A (p = 0.01). Fibrinogen (p = 0.002) decreased significantly. and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein had a tendency to decrease, but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). RLX treatment had no effect on ECLT (p = 0.223) or on white blood cell, lymphocyte. and total monocyte counts (p = 0.313). Monocyte expression of HLA-DR, CD14, and CD62-L was not modified by the treatment. In conclusion, we confirm that RLX has beneficial short-term effects on levels of lipids and inflammatory markers, with no effect on fibrinolysis or monocyte phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据