4.5 Article

Tumour budding at invasive margins and outcome in colorectal cancer

期刊

COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 41-47

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01240.x

关键词

tumour budding; colorectal cancer; outcome; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Tumour budding, defined as small clusters of undifferentiated cancer cells at invasive margins, has been shown to reflect biologic aggressiveness of colorectal cancers. We therefore examined the prognostic significance of tumour budding in patients with colorectal carcinoma, particularly focusing on comparisons with other clinicopathological findings. Method Tumour budding was investigated in surgically resected specimens from 159 patients with colorectal carcinoma. With haematoxylin and eosin stained slides containing the entire invasive margin, the degree of tumour budding was classified into three grades: mild, < 1/3 of the entire invasive margin; moderate, 1/3-2/3; marked, > 2/3. Results Mild tumour budding was found in 54 (34%) cases, moderate in 59 (37%) cases and marked in 46 (29%) cases. The degree of budding was linked with poor tumour differentiation, lymph node metastasis and advanced TNM stage (P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, patients with marked tumour budding [5-year cancer-related survival (CRS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), 39%/53%] had significantly worse survival [CRS, hazard ratio (HR), 4.561; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.265-9.184; P < 0.001; RFS, HR, 3.240; 95% CI, 1.430-7.342; P = 0.005] than those with mild (5-year CRS/RFS, 80%/82%) or moderate (63%/66%) budding. In the Cox regression model, marked tumour budding (HR, 3.137; 95% CI, 1.517-6.487; P = 0.002) and advanced tumour stage (stage III, HR, 3.226; 95% CI, 1.475-7.053; P = 0.003; stage IV, HR, 24.443; 95% CI, 10.843-55.100; P < 0.001) proved to be an independent predictor of short CRS. Conclusion Tumour budding is a practical and significant histological index for identification of high malignant potential and poor outcome in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据