4.4 Article

Effect of lyophilization and freeze-thawing on the stability of siRNA-liposome complexes

期刊

AAPS PHARMSCITECH
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 335-341

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-007-9000-1

关键词

DLS; FACS; freeze-thaw; liposomes; lyophilization; siRNA

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG010485, P01-AG10485] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R21 NS048782, NS048782] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R21NS048782] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG010485] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this research was to describe the application of lyophilization in the delivery of siRNA using cationic lipids by addressing the long-term formulation/stability issues associated with cationic lipids and to understand the mechanism of lyoprotection. siRNA liposomes complexes were formed in different potential cyro/lyoprotectants and subjected to either lyophilization or freeze thaw cycles. siRNA, liposomes and/or lipoplexes were tested for activity, SYBR Green I binding, cellular uptake and particle size. The lipoplexes when lyophilized in the presence of sugars as lyoprotectants could be lyophilized and reconstituted without loss of transfection efficacy but in ionic solutions they lost 65-75% of their functionality. The mechanism of this loss of activity was further investigated. The lyophilization process did not alter siRNA's intrinsic biological activity as was evident by the ability of lyophilized siRNA to retain functionality and SYBR green I binding ability. While the lipoplex size dramatically increased (similar to 50-70 times) after lyophilization in the absence of non-ionic lyoprotectants. This increase in size correlated to the decrease in cellular accumulation of siRNA and a decrease in activity. In conclusion, siRNAs can be applied in cationic lipid lyophilized formulations and these complexes represent a potential method of increasing the stability of pre-formed complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据