4.3 Article

Anti-VEGF response in macular hemorrhage and incidence of retinal pigment epithelial tears

出版社

CANADIAN OPHTHAL SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.01.023

关键词

-

资金

  1. Karl Kirchgessner Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To study the visual and anatomic outcomes of serial anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for severe macular hemorrhage in eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design: Consecutive retrospective analysis. Participants: Twenty eyes from 20 patients with severe macular hemorrhage (greater than 50% blockage with formal fluorescein angiography [FA]) secondary to wet AMD were studied. Methods: We performed a chart review of patients at a single centre from May 2006 to September 2009. Presenting visual acuity and diameter of hemorrhage were recorded as well as number of injections, time by which no hemorrhage was remaining, and final anatomic outcome. Cardiovascular risk factors and use of antiplatelet medication or anticoagulation were noted. Results: Average presenting visual acuity was 1.55 (20/710), and number of injections needed for resolution of hemorrhage was 4. Visual acuity significantly improved from 1.55 (20/710) to 0.70 (20/100) after injections. Thirty-five percent of eyes were found to have an associated retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tear, and these eyes were found to have received more injections. Final visual acuity was not significantly different in eyes with RPE tears compared with nontear eyes. Eighty-one percent of patients had associated cardiovascular risk factors; antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation were not found to play a role in hemorrhage size. Conclusions: RPE tears are found in a significant number of individuals with large macular hemorrhages secondary to exudative macular degeneration, but with continued treatment with anti-VEGF therapy, visual acuity can significantly improve even in the presence of these tears. Eyes with severe macular hemorrhage thus should be considered candidates for anti-VEGF therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据