4.6 Article

Kinetic-catalytic method for sequential determination of iron and copper using a chip coupled to a multipumping flow system

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 7, 期 18, 页码 7858-7865

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ay00799b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTQ2013-47461]
  2. CNPq [313660/2014-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A kinetic-catalytic spectrophotometric method for the sequential determination of iron and copper is presented in this work. For this, a multipumping flow system (MPFS) has been coupled to a monolithic flow conductor, called a chip. The reaction is based on the catalytic effect of Cu(II) and Fe(III) on hydroxylamine oxidation in a basic medium. The addition of EDTA inhibits the Cu(II) catalytic effect and the reaction becomes selective for Fe(III). The nitrite produced is spectrophotometrically measured using a modified Griess reagent. Due to the importance of the mixing order of the reagents, a special design of the chip is proposed. The sample, hydroxylamine and buffer (with EDTA for Fe and without EDTA for Cu determination) have been simultaneously propelled into the thermostated first section of the chip for mixing and reaction at 40 degrees C. Then, this mixture and the modified Griess reagent (sulphanilamide and N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine) have been injected by confluence into the second section of the chip. Under optimal conditions, the determinable range was 3-75 mu g L-1 and 70-350 mu g L-1 for Cu(II) and Fe(III) respectively, with a sample throughput of 32 h(-1) for Fe(III) and 39 h(-1) for Cu(II). The limits of detection were 0.95 mu g L-1 for Cu(II) and 21 mu g L-1 for Fe(III). The relative standard deviations (n - 6) were 1.6% for 50 mu g L-1 Cu(II) and 1.3% for 100 mu g L-1 Fe(III). The proposed method has been successfully applied to the sequential determination of Cu(II) and Fe(III) in wastewater and pharmaceutical samples. ICP-OES has been used as a reference method for validation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据