4.3 Article

Using retinal architecture to help characterize multiple sclerosis patients

出版社

CANADIAN OPHTHAL SOC
DOI: 10.3129/i10-063

关键词

optic neuritis; multiple sclerosis; optical coherence tomography

资金

  1. E.A. Baker Foundation of the Canadian National Institute
  2. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We compared retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and visual function in a heterogeneous multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort to determine whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) may complement the existing methods used to characterize MS patients. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Participants: One hundred and ninety-three patients with optic neuritis (ON) as a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (n = 63), relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) (n = 108), secondary progressive MS (SPMS) (n = 13), and primary progressive MS (PPMS) (n = 9). Methods: All patients underwent standardized ophthalmic, neurological, and OCT testing at a single academic institution. Results: RNFL values were reduced in PPMS (94.3 mu m), RRMS (99.6 mu m), and SPMS eyes (84.7 mu m) relative to CIS eyes (105.7 mu m) (p < 0.0001). RNFL values were lower in eyes with recurrent ON (64.2 mu m) relative to eyes affected by a single ON event (86.3 mu m) (p < 0.0001). The strongest correlation between RNFL thickness and neurological disability occurred in RRMS patients (r = -0.51, p < 0.0001). RNFL thickness correlated with visual field sensitivity for CIS (r = 0.23, p < 0.01) and RRMS (r = 0.22, p < 0.01) patients. Simple linear regression showed that every 10 pm decrease in RNFL correlated with a 5.8 decibel decrease in visual field sensitivity (adjusted R(2) = 0.35, p < 0.0001) for RNFL values less than 75 mu m. Conclusions: There were robust correlations between RNFL thickness and visual function, particularly in ON eyes. OCT may complement the existing tools used to characterize MS patients, but further studies are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据