4.3 Article

Gastrointestinal microbiome modulator improves glucose tolerance in overweight and obese subjects: A randomized controlled pilot trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 1272-1276

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.08.023

关键词

Microbiota; beta-Glucan; Inulin; Blueberry; Glucose tolerance; Satiety

资金

  1. Microbiome Therapeutics LLC
  2. NORC Center Grant [2P30DK072476]
  3. NIDDK
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health the Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center [1 U54 GM104940]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the effects of a gastrointestinal microbiome modulator (GIMM) containing inulin, beta-glucan, blueberry anthocyanins, and blueberry polyphenols on metabolic parameters, fecal markers of gut microbiota, and satiety. Design and methods: Thirty overweight or obese individuals aged 18 to 70 years, were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Participants consumed the test product or placebo daily for four weeks. Stool samples were collected and blood was drawn at baseline and week four for assessments of gut microbiota, satiety hormones, glucose control, and lipid measures. Subjective satiety was assessed weekly. Linear models were used to compare differences from baseline to week four. Results: GIMM consumption improved blood glucose tolerance (p = 0.008), and increased satiety (p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences in insulin sensitivity, fecal markers of gut microbiota, plasma satiety hormones, or serum lipid concentrations between the groups. However, plasma satiety hormones and fecal short chain fatty acid concentrations increased in the test group compared to the placebo. Conclusions: GIMM consumption for four weeks, increases satiety, and improves glucose tolerance possibly through insulin-independent pathways. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据