4.2 Article

2-Methoxyestradiol Attenuates Autophagy Activation After Global Ischemia

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 631-638

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S031716710001218X

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [03DZ19702, 06JC14052]
  2. Shanghai Key Discipline Program [S30202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) is a key transcriptional factor activated during cerebral ischemia, which regulates a great number of downstream genes, including those associated with cell death. In the present study, we aimed to test the hypothesis that post-ischemic HIF-1 alpha up-regulation might promote autophagy activation; thereby, HIF-1 alpha inhibitor 2ME2 might prevent neurons from ischemic injury through inhibiting autophagy. Methods: Global ischemia was induced using the four-vessel occlusion model (4-VO) in Sprague-Dawley rats (male, 250-280g). 2-Methoxyestradiol (2ME2, 5mg/kg, i.p.) was administrated to down-regulate HIF-1 alpha expression. Post-ischemic beclin-1 and LC3 protein expression was determined at different time points through Western blot assay. Neuronal injury was determined by cresyl violet staining and TUNEL staining in coronal histological sections. Results: The expression of beclin-1 and the ratio of LC3-II/LC3-I increased significantly at 12 and 24 h after ischemia. 2ME2 could remarkably inhibit the up-regulation of beclin-1 and the increase of LC3-II/LC3-I ratio during reperfusion. Moreover, 2ME2 and 3-MA exhibited powerful protective effects against ischemic/reperfusion induced neuronal injury. Conclusions: This study confirmed that autophagy participated in post-ischemic neuronal injury. 2ME2, a HIF-1 alpha inhibitor, might significantly decrease autophagy activation after cerebral ischemia and relieve post-ischemic neuronal injury. Our findings demonstrate that autophagy could be a potential target for neuronal protection after cerebral ischemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据