4.6 Article

Lyn tyrosine kinase is required for P2X(4) receptor upregulation and neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury

期刊

GLIA
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 50-58

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.20591

关键词

Src family kinase; Lyn; P2X(4) receptor; microglia; spinal cord; neuropathic pain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuropathic pain, a debilitating chronic pain following nerve damage, is a reflection of the aberrant functioning of a pathologically altered nervous system. One hallmark is abnormal pain hypersensitivity to innocuous stimuli (tactile allodynia), for which effective therapy is lacking, and the underlying mechanisms of which remain to be determined. Here we show that Lyn, a member of the Src family kinases (SFKs), plays an important role in the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain. Nerve injury, but not peripheral inflammation, increased immunoreactivity for active SFKs that were autophosphorylated in the kinase domain (phospho-SFKIR) in spinal microglia. In spinally derived microglial cells, we identified Lyn as the predominant SFK among the five members (Src, Fyn, Yes, Lck, and Lyn) known to be expressed in the CNS. Lyn expression in the spinal cord was highly restricted to microglia, and its level was increased after nerve injury. We found that mice lacking lyn (lyn(-/-)) exhibit a striking reduction in the levels of phospho-SFK-IR and tactile allodynia after nerve injury, without any change in basal mechanical sensitivity or inflammatory pain. Importantly, lyn(-/-) mice displayed impaired upregulation of the ionotropic ATP receptor subtype P2X(4) receptors (P2X(4)R) in the spinal cord after nerve injury, which is crucial for tactile allodynia. Microglial cells from lyn(-/-) mice showed a deficit in their ability to increase P2X4R expression in response to fibronectin, a factor implicated as a microglial P2X4R upregulator in allodynia. Together, our findings suggest that Lyn may be a critical kinase mediating nerve injury-induced P2X4R upregulation and neuropathic pain. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据