4.5 Article

The reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 375-382

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1041610207005601

关键词

neuropsychiatric symptoms; nursing homes; validity; reliability; dementia

资金

  1. Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
  2. Innlandet Hospital Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Psychiatric symptoms and behavioral disturbances are highly prevalent in the residents of nursing homes. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is a commonly used scale for the assessment of such symptoms in diverse settings. We have conducted a study of the reliability and the validity of the Norwegian version of the NPI nursing home version (NPI-NH). Methods: The reliability study comprised 41 patients. We established inter-rater reliability between raters with various levels of health education using K statistics. Fifty patients were included in the validity study. The patients were examined by a physician, who also rated the patient's behavior using behavioral pathology in Alzheimer's disease (BEHAVE-AD). Subsequently, a research nurse performed a standardized interview using the NPI and the Cornell scale. Concurrent validity of the NPI and the BEHAVE-AD was analyzed. Results: Internal consistency, as measured by Cronbach's alpha was above 0.8. Inter-rater reliability was, except for one item, between 0.85 and 1.0 across assessors with different levels of health education. All correlations between the NPI and the BEHAVE-AD were significant, ranging from 0.38 to 0.72. The weakest correlations were between items assessing affective and anxiety symptoms. Conclusion: The Norwegian version of the NPI-NH is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing psychiatric symptoms and behavioral disturbances in the residents of nursing homes. The investigation of depressive symptoms merits particular attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据