4.3 Article

Factors governing the regulation of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum cutinase A and polygalacturonase 1 during different stages of infection

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 5, 页码 605-616

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/W2012-031

关键词

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; cutinase; polygalacturonase; virulence; cAMP; calcium signalling

资金

  1. SaskCanola
  2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Developing Innovative Agri-Products program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum releases hydrolytic enzymes that sequentially degrade the plant cuticle, middle lamellae, and primary and secondary cell walls. The cuticle was found to be a barrier to S. sclerotiorum infection, as leaves stripped of epicuticular wax were more rapidly colonized. Consequently, the factors affecting the regulation of genes encoding polygalacturonase 1 (SsPG1) and a newly identified cutinase (SsCUTA) were examined. In vitro, SsCutA transcripts were detected within 1 h postinoculation of leaves, and expression was primarily governed by contact of mycelia with solid surfaces. Expression of SsPg1 was moderately induced by contact with solid surfaces including the leaf, and expression was restricted to the expanding margin of the lesion as the infection progressed. SsPg1 expression was induced by carbohydrate starvation but repressed by galacturonic acid. Glucose supported a basal level of SsPg1 expression but accentuated expression when provided to mycelia used to inoculate leaves. These observations were contrary to earlier reports indicating that glucose repressed SsPg1 expression while galacturonic acid induced expression. Pharmacological studies showed that disruption of calcium signalling affected SsCutA and SsPg1 expression and decreased S. sclerotiorum virulence, whereas elevated cAMP levels reduced virulence without affecting gene expression. The mechanisms involved in coordinating the expression of S. sclerotiorum hydrolytic enzymes throughout the various stages of the infection are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据