4.4 Article

Effects of drug hydrophobicity on liposomal stability

期刊

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
卷 71, 期 1, 页码 3-7

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2007.00610.x

关键词

drug delivery systems; drug hydrophobicity; drug release; liposomes

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA077402] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB000289] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [CA 77402] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB 000289, R01 EB000289] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A major obstacle in drug delivery is the inability to effectively deliver drugs to their intended biological target without deleterious side-effects. Delivery vehicles such as liposomes can minimize toxic side-effects by shielding the drug from reaction with unintended targets while in systemic circulation. Liposomes have the ability to accommodate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs, either in the internal aqueous core or the lipid bilayer, respectively. In the present study, fluorescein and rhodamine have been used to model hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs, respectively. We have compared the stabilities of liposomes encapsulating these fluorophores as a function of lipid content, time, and temperature. At 25 and 37 degrees C, liposomes containing distearoyl phosphatidylcholine as the major phospholipid component were found to be more stable over time than those containing dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine, regardless of the fluorophore encapsulated. Liposomes loaded with fluorescein were found to be more stable than those with rhodamine. Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine liposomes that encapsulated rhodamine were the least stable. The results indicate that the physical properties of the drug cargo play a role in the stability, and hence drug delivery kinetics, of liposomal delivery systems, and desired drug release times can be achieved by adjusting/fine-tuning the lipid compositions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据