4.4 Article

Ecosite-based predictive modeling of black spruce (Picea mariana) wood quality attributes in boreal Ontario

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 465-475

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0252

关键词

black spruce; earlywood-latewood ratio; juvenile wood; mature wood

类别

资金

  1. Nipissing University
  2. Canadian Wood Fibre Centre
  3. Nipissing University Forest Bioproducts Research Chair boreal ecosite project (RMF)
  4. AFRIT/Geoide enhanced FRI projects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhanced forest resources inventory systems delineate and define polygons based on fundamental ecological units such as ecosites, which are standard combinations of vegetation and substrate types. Our study objective was to model wood quality characteristics of individual black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B. S. P.) trees across a representative boreal forest landscape in northeastern Ontario, Canada, based on relationships to ecosite and other stand-level variables. A total of 127 large (12 mm) increment core samples were extracted at breast height from dominant or co-dominant black spruce trees in forest stands representing a gradient from dry sandy to wet mineral and organic ecosites. Sample cores were prepared, processed, and analyzed using standard SilviScan protocols. Hierarchical classification models were then fitted using Random Forests to predict density and latewood percentage for black spruce stems at a reference age of 50 years. These models each explained over 32% of variance, with estimated root mean squared errors of 40.4 kg.m(-3) and 5.6% for density and latewood percentage, respectively. Among tree-, site-, and stand-level covariates, ecosite group was the most important predictive variable. Knowledge of ecosite - wood quality relationships could support efficient planning for black spruce management by including an indication of potential use as a modeled variable in a forest inventory system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据