4.6 Article

Development of sequence characterized DNA markers linked to leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix) resistance in coffee (Coffea arabica L.)

期刊

MOLECULAR BREEDING
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 105-113

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-007-9112-z

关键词

breeding; coffee; Hemileia vastatrix; leaf rust resistance; marker-assisted selection; molecular marker

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coffee leaf rust due to Hemileia vastatrix is one of the most serious diseases in Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica). A resistance gene (S-H(3)) has been transferred from C. liberica into C. arabica. The present work aimed at developing sequence-characterized genetic markers for leaf rust resistance. Linkage between markers and leaf rust resistance was tested by analysing two segregating populations, one F-2 population of 101 individuals and one backcross (BC2) population of 43 individuals, derived from a cross between a susceptible and a SH3-introgressed resistant genotype. A total of ten sequence-characterized genetic markers closely associated with the SH3 leaf rust resistance gene were generated. These included simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers, sequence-characterised amplified regions (SCAR) markers resulting from the conversion of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers previously identified and SCAR markers derived from end-sequences of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones. Those BAC clones were identified by screening of C. arabica genomic BAC library using a cloned AFLP-marker as probe. The markers we developed are easy and inexpensive to run, requiring one PCR step followed by gel separation. While three markers were linked in repulsion with the S-H(3) gene, seven markers were clustered in coupling around the S-H(3) gene. Notably, two markers appeared to co-segregate perfectly with the S-H(3) gene in the two plant populations analyzed. These markers are suitable for marker-assisted selection for leaf rust resistance and to facilitate pyramiding of the S-H(3) gene with other leaf rust resistance genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据