4.3 Article

The Effect of Question Order on Reporting Physical Activity and Walking Behavior

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 S16-S29

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.5.s1.s16

关键词

survey; BRFSS; moderate physical activity; vigorous physical activity

资金

  1. PHS HHS [U48/CCU-409664, R06/CCR421479] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [1-U48-DP-000051] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREV AND HEALTH PROMO [U48DP000051] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Question order might affect self-reported regular physical activity (PA) measured with items from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) PA module. Methods: A telephone survey was conducted using 2 forms (N = 1004, N = 212) with varying PA question order. The standard form presented moderate-PA, vigorous-PA, and walking questions, in that order, whereas the alternate form presented walking questions, followed by moderate-PA, and then vigorous-PA questions. Weighted, adjusted rates of vigorous PA, walking, meeting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendation for moderate or vigorous PA, and moderate PA from each form were compared. Results: Vigorous PA and walking were similar regardless of question order. Meeting the CDC recommendation for moderate or vigorous PA was reported less often with the alternate form among 18- to 34-year-olds. Less moderate PA was reported with the alternate form overall and among 18- to 34-year-olds, women, whites, and those with a high school education or less. Conclusion: Estimating PA and walking across sociodemographic strata with differing patterns of PA requires asking moderate-PA and vigorous-PA questions before walking questions. Asking walking questions first might lead to bias, especially for moderate PA. Walking, added to a survey with BRFSS moderate and vigorous PA items, should be placed after moderate and vigorous PA. Walking questions first may cause bias, especially for moderate PA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据