4.2 Article

Mood Variability and Cigarette Smoking Escalation Among Adolescents

期刊

PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 504-513

出版社

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.4.504

关键词

cigarette smoking; adolescence; moods; affect regulation; ecological momentary assessments

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA098262, R01CA080266] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [T32DA007293] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA080266, P01 CA098262-04, P01 CA098262, R01 CA080266-04, CA80266, CA098262] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [T32 DA007293, T32 DA008293, T32 DA007293-14] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study examined how affect dysregulation, as indexed via within-person negative mood variability, related to longitudinal patterns of smoking among adolescents. Students in the 8th and 10th grades (N = 517, 56% girls) provided data on cigarette use at baseline, 6-, and 12-month waves and provided ecological momentary assessments of negative moods via palmtop computers for 1 week at each wave. Mood variability was examined via the intraindividual standard deviations of negative mood reports at each wave. As predicted, high levels of negative mood variability at baseline significantly differentiated participants who escalated in their smoking behavior over time from participants who never progressed beyond low levels of experimentation during the course of the study. Mixed-effects regression models revealed that participants who escalated in their smoking experienced a reduction in mood variability as smoking increased, whereas participants with consistently high or low levels of cigarette use had more stable mood variability levels. Results suggest that high negative mood variability is a risk factor for future smoking escalation and that mood-stabilizing effects may reinforce and maintain daily cigarette use among youths.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据