4.2 Article

Sorl1 as an Alzheimer's disease predisposition gene?

期刊

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 60-64

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000110789

关键词

Sorl1; Alzheimer's disease; predisposition gene; APOE gene; sortilin-related receptor

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G0701075] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01HL084744] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIA NIH HHS [P50-AG08671, AG05128, P30 AG19610, P50 AG16570, U01 AG016976, P30-AG13846] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIMH NIH HHS [MH60451] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NINDS NIH HHS [U24NS051872, NS39764] Funding Source: Medline
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [P50MH060451] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [U24NS051872, P50NS039764] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P50AG008671, P30AG019610, P50AG016570, U01AG016976, P30AG013846] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. MRC [G0701075] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressively disabling impairments in memory, cognition, and non-cognitive behavioural symptoms. Sporadic AD is multifactorial and genetically complex. While several monogenic mutations cause early-onset AD and gene alleles have been suggested as AD susceptibility factors, the only extensively validated susceptibility gene for late-onset AD is the apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon 4 allele. Alleles of the APOE gene do not account for all of the genetic load calculated to be responsible for AD predisposition. Recently, polymorphisms across the neuronal sortilin-related receptor (SORL1) gene were shown to be significantly associated with AD in several cohorts. Here we present the results of our large case-control whole-genome scan at over 500,000 polymorphisms which presents weak evidence for association and potentially narrows the association interval. Copyright (C) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据