4.1 Article

Farm practices as they affect NH3 emissions from beef cattle

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
卷 92, 期 4, 页码 525-543

出版社

AGRICULTURAL INST CANADA
DOI: 10.4141/CJAS2012-055

关键词

Manure; best management practices; emissions; odor

资金

  1. National Agri-Environmental Health Analysis and Reporting Program - NAHARP of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  2. National Agri-Environmental Standards 'Initiative - NAESI of Environment Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sheppard, S. C. and Bittman, S. 2012. Farm practices as they affect NH3 emissions from beef cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 92: 525-543. Beef cattle farms in Canada are very diverse, both in size and management. Because the total biomass of beef cattle in Canada is larger than any other livestock sector, beef also has the potential for the largest environmental impact. In this study we estimate NH3 emissions associated with beef cattle production across Canada using data on farm practices obtained from a detailed survey answered by 1380 beef farmers in 11 Ecoregions. The farms were various combinations of cow/calf, backgrounding and finishing operations. The proportion of animals on pasture varied markedly among Ecoregions, especially for cows and calves, and this markedly affected the estimated NH3 emissions. The crop components of feed also varied among Ecoregions, but the resulting crude protein concentrations were quite consistent for both backgrounding and finishing cattle. Manure was stored longer in the west than in the east, and fall spreading of manure was notably more common in the west, especially when spread on tilled land. The estimated NH3 emissions per animal were relatively consistent across Ecoregions for confinement production, but because the proportion of animals on pasture varied with Ecoregion, so did the overall estimated NH3 emissions per animal. Temperature is a key factor causing Ecoregion differences, although husbandry and manure management practices are also important. Hypothetical best management practices had little ability to reduce overall emission estimates, and could not be implemented without detailed cost/benefit analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据