4.1 Article

Energy and nutrient digestibility in a hulless low-phytate phosphorus barley fed to finishing pigs

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 393-399

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.4141/CJAS10019

关键词

Barley; low-phytate barley; nutrient digestibility; phytate P; pigs

资金

  1. Manitoba Rural Adaptation Council
  2. Manitoba Pork Council
  3. Canadian Wheat Board
  4. Canadian International Grains Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ige, D. V., Kiarie, E., Akinremi, O. O., Rossnagel, B., Flatten, D. and Nyachoti, C. M. 2010. Energy and nutrient digestibility in a hulless low-phytate phosphorus barley fed to finishing pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 90: 393-399. Six-ileal cannulated finishing barrows were used to determine energy and nutrient digestibility in a sample of a hulless low-phytate (LP) barley cultivar. A sample of regular hulled (RH) barley was also included for comparison. Two diets containing 96.5% of either LP or RH barley, 2.5% trace minerals and vitamins and 1% indigestible marker (Celite) were fed in a two-period change-over design. Each experimental period lasted 9 d; a 5-d acclimatization period followed by 2 d of fecal and 2 d of ileal digesta collection. Standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of amino acids (AA) was calculated using published values for ileal endogenous AA losses from our laboratory. Total phosphorus (as is) was similar in LP and RH; however, LP had lower phytate phosphorus (0.6 vs. 2.3, g kg(-1)) than RH. Apparent digestibility of phosphorus was higher (P <0.01) for LP barley than RH at both ilea! (45 vs. 24%) and faecal (55 vs. 32%) levels. Compared with RH, LP had higher (P <0.05) DE and SID contents of all indispensable AA except Phe. In summary, a hulless low-phytate barley sample fed to finishing pigs had higher digestible phosphorus, energy and AA contents than regular hulled barley, indicating that use of hulless low-phytate barley in swine diets may have ecological benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据