4.7 Article

Short communication: Arcobacter butzleri and Arcobacter cryaerophilus survival and growth in artisanal and industrial ricotta cheese

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 98, 期 10, 页码 6776-6781

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9560

关键词

Arcobacter butzleri; Arcobacter cryaerophilus; ricotta cheese; survival; growth

资金

  1. program TERRAVITA: Biodiversita, territorio e nutrizione. La sostenibilita dell'agro-alimentare italiano

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ricotta cheese is a ready-to-eat product with properties (pH > 6.0, a(w) > 0.98-0.99) and moisture content (75-80%) that may pose a risk to public health due to postprocess contamination by several bacterial pathogens, including Arcobacters. The objective of the study was to evaluate the behavior of Arcobacter butzleri and Arcobacter cryaerophilus in ricotta cheese during its shelf life assuming postprocessing contamination. Two types of ricotta cheese, artisanal water buffalo (WB) and industrial cow milk ricotta cheese, were experimentally contaminated with A. butzleri and A. cryaerophilus and the count was monitored at 2 different temperatures (6 degrees C and 12 degrees C) during shelf life of 5 d for WB cheese and 22 d for industrial ricotta cheese. In WB ricotta cheese the A. butzleri count remained stable during the 5 d of storage at 6 degrees C, whereas a moderate but significant decrease was observed in A. cryaerophilus count. The counts of both species increased when WB ricotta cheese was stored at 12 degrees C. In industrial ricotta cheese stored at 6 degrees C, a significant reduction was observed both in A. butzleri and A. cryaerophilus counts during the 22-d storage period; at 12 degrees C storage, a count increase was observed for both Arcobacter species up to d 14 of storage after which the log cfu/g count resulted constant until d 22 of storage. The ability of A. butzleri and A. cryaerophilus to survive at 6 degrees C and to grow at 12 degrees C in ricotta cheese has significant food safety implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据