3.8 Article

Scientific Output and Impact: Relative Positions of China, Europe, India, Japan and the USA

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09737766.2008.10700848

关键词

-

资金

  1. Carlsberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Publication outputs and word shares of scientific publication are presented for 1981-2004 for China, Europe, India, Japan and the USA. Our results are compared with those available in the literature. The current situation whereby the main producers of scientific output statistics use different counting methods -thus, producing major differences in scientific output values -is unsatisfactory. The share in the total number of publications has been stagnating or gradually decreasing in recent years for Europe, the USA, India and Japan although there is no absolute decline in publication activities. The most dramatic trend has been the fast growth in China. The USA is still maintaining a lead in publication impact. The impact from EU, Japan, China and India increases but is still far behind as compared to USA. In the conclusion the question is raised whether publications and citations are the real output of science or constitute the discourse of science. There is a risk that we concentrate our discussion on what can be easily measured, i. e. publications and citations, instead of what really matters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据