4.5 Article

Estimation of rockburst wall-rock velocity invoked by slab flexure sources in deep tunnels

期刊

CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 520-539

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2013-0337

关键词

rockburst; slab buckling; wall-rock velocity; rockburst source mechanism

资金

  1. National Special Funds of China for Major State Basic Research Project [2010CB732006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51309218, 51279201, 41272349]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For rock support in burst-prone ground, the wall-rock velocity adjacent to the surface of underground openings is a vital support design parameter, and depends on the seismic source mechanism inducing rockburst damage. In this study, to estimate the wall-rock velocity evoked only by rock slab buckling (an important rockburst source mechanism), a comprehensive velocity assessment method is proposed, using an excellent slab column buckling model with a small eccentricity, which relies on a novel compressive or tensile buckling failure criterion of rock slab. The true-triaxial loading-unloading tests and rockburst case analyses reveal that rock mass slabbing induced by high rock stress has major impacts on the evolution and formation of buckling rockburst in deep tunnels. Using a method based on the energy balance principle, the slabbing thickness of intact rock mass is also calculated by an analytical method, which indicates that the slabbing thickness parameter has a nonlinear relation to the following six parameters: uniaxial tensile strength (UTS), uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), normal stress (sigma(n)), length of joint (L), friction angle (phi(r)), and joint roughness coefficient (JRC). These proposed models and methods have been quite successfully applied to rockburst and slabbing cases occurring in deep tunnels. These applications show that slab flexure is an important source mechanism invoking high wall-rock velocities and leading to severe rockburst damages in the area surrounding deep tunnels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据