4.8 Article

Wnt/beta-catenin signaling mediates oval cell response in rodents

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 288-295

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.21973

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA124414] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK062277] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [1R01CA124414] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [1R01DK62277] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adult hepatic stem cells or oval cells are facultative stem cells in the liver that are activated during regeneration only during inhibition of innate hepatocyte proliferation. On the basis of its involvement in liver cancer, regeneration, and development, we investigated the role of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in oval cell response, which was initiated in male Fisher rats with 2-acetylaminofluorine and two-third partial hepatectomy (PHX). Extensive oval cell activation and proliferation were observed at 5 and 10 days post-PHX, as indicated by hematoxylin-eosin and proliferating cell nuclear antigen analysis. A noteworthy increase in total and active beta-catenin was observed at this time, which was localized to the oval cell cytoplasm and nuclei by immunohistochemistry and confirmed by double immunofluorescence. A concomitant increase in Wnt-1 in hepatocytes along with increased expression of Frizzled-2 in oval cells was observed. This paracrine mechanism coincided with a decrease in Wnt inhibitory factor-1 and glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta down-regulation leading to beta-catenin stabilization. To strengthen its role, beta-catenin conditional knockout mice were treated with 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine to induce oval cell activation. A dramatic decrease in the A6-positive oval cell numbers in the absence of P-catenin demonstrated a critical role of beta-catenin in oval cell biology. Conclusion: The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway plays a key role in the normal activation and proliferation of adult hepatic stem cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据