4.6 Article

Analysis of the molecular dynamics of medaka nuage proteins by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 275, 期 2, 页码 341-349

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06204.x

关键词

fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; fluorescence recovery after photobleaching; medaka; primordial germ cell; vasa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nuage is a unique organelle in animal germ cells that is known as an electron-dense amorphous structure in the perinuclear region. Although the nuage is essential for primordial germ cell (PGC) determination and development, its roles and functions are poorly understood. Herein, we report an analysis of the diffusion properties of the olvas gene product of the medaka fish (Oryzias lapites) in PGCs prepared from embryos, using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Olvas-green fluorescent protein (GFP) localized in granules thought to be nuages, and exhibited a constraint movement with two-component diffusion constants of 0.15 and 0.01 mu m(2).s(-1). On the other hand, cytosolic Olvas-GFP was also observed to have a diffusion movement of 7.0 mu m(2).s(-1). Interestingly, Olvas-GFP could be expressed in HeLa cells, and formed granules that were similar to nuages in medaka PGCs. Olvas-GFP also exhibited a constraint movement in the granules and diffused in the cytosol of HeLa cells, just as in the medaka embryo. The other two gene products, Nanos and Tudor of the medaka, which are known as constituents of the nuage, could also be expressed in HeLa cells and formed granules that colocalized with Olvas-GFP. Nanos-GFP and Tudor-GFP exhibited constraint movement in the granules and diffused in the cytosol of HeLa cells. These results suggest that these granules in the HeLa cell are not simple aggregations or rigid complexes, but dynamic structures consisting of several proteins that shuttle back and forth between the cytosol and the granules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据