4.4 Article

Circulating Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) in Predialysis Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Relationship with Bone Density and Arterial Stiffness

期刊

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
卷 90, 期 6, 页码 473-480

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-012-9595-4

关键词

Chronic kidney disease; Wnt pathway; DKK1; Sclerostin; Arterial stiffness; Bone mineral density

资金

  1. Friends of Guy's Hospital, London, UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abnormalities of bone metabolism and increased vascular calcification are common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and important causes of morbidity and mortality. The Wnt signaling pathway may play a role in the bone and vascular disturbances seen in CKD, termed collectively CKD-MBD. The aim of the study was to investigate the possible association of circulating concentrations of the secreted Wnt signaling inhibitors DKK1 and sclerostin with BMD and arterial stiffness in predialysis CKD. Seventy-seven patients (48 M, 29 F), mean age 57 (SD = 14) years with CKD stages 3B ( = 32) and 4 ( = 45) were studied. Sclerostin, DKK1, PTH, and 1,25(OH)(2)D were analyzed. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and forearm (FARM). Arterial stiffness index was determined by contour analysis of digital volume pulse (SIDVP). There was a positive correlation between sclerostin and age ( = 0.47, < 0.000). Sclerostin was higher in men than women ( = 0.013). Following correction for age and gender, there was a negative association between GFR and sclerostin ( = 0.002). We observed a positive association between sclerostin and BMD at the LS ( = 0.0001), FN ( = 0.004), and TH ( = 0.002). In contrast, DKK1 was negatively associated with BMD at the FN ( = 0.038). A negative association was seen between DKK1 and SIDVP ( = 0.027). Our data suggest that the Wnt pathway may play a role in CKD-MBD. Prospective studies are required to establish the clinical relevance of sclerostin and DKK1 as serological markers in CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据