4.6 Article

The XMM-Newton bright serendipitous survey - Identification and optical spectral properties

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 477, 期 3, 页码 735-U53

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078568

关键词

galaxies : active; galaxies : nuclei; quasars : emission lines; X-ray : galaxies; Surveys

资金

  1. STFC [ST/F006497/1, PP/E001173/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F001967/1, PP/E00105X/1, PP/E001173/1, ST/F006497/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. We present the optical classification and redshift of 348 X-ray selected sources from the XMM-Newton Bright Serendipitous Survey (XBS), which contains a total of 400 objects (identification level = 87%). About 240 are new identifications. In particular, we discuss in detail the classification criteria adopted for the active galactic nuclei (AGNs) population. Methods. By means of systematic spectroscopic campaigns using various telescopes and through the literature search, we have collected an optical spectrum for the large majority of the sources in the XBS survey and applied a well-defined classification flow chart. Results. We find that the AGNs represent the most numerous population at the flux limit of the XBS survey (similar to 10(-13) erg cm(-2) s(-1)) constituting 80% of the XBS sources selected in the 0.5-4.5 keV energy band and 95% of the hard (4.5-7.5 keV) selected objects. Galactic sources populate the 0.5-4.5 keV sample significantly (17%) and only marginally (3%) the 4.5-7.5 keV sample. The remaining sources in both samples are clusters/groups of galaxies and normal galaxies (i.e. probably not powered by an AGN). Furthermore, the percentage of type 2 AGNs (i.e. optically absorbed AGNs with A(V) > 2 mag) dramatically increases going from the 0.5-4.5 keV sample (f = N-AGN2/N-AGN = 7%) to the 4.5-7.5 keV sample (f = 32%). We finally propose two simple diagnostic plots that can be easily used to obtain the spectral classification for relatively low-redshift AGNs even if the quality of the spectrum is not good.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据