4.6 Article

Sporadic childhood hepatoblastomas show activation of beta-catenin, mismatch repair defects and p53 mutations

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 7-14

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800977

关键词

hepatoblastoma; mutations; beta-catenin; p53; microsatellite instability; immunohistochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatoblastoma, a rare embryonic tumor that may arise sporadically or in the context of hereditary syndromes (familial adenomatous polyposis and Beckwith-Wiedemann's) is the most frequent liver cancer of childhood. Deregulation of the APC/beta-catenin pathway occurs in a consistent fraction of hepatoblastomas, with mutations in the APC and beta-catenin genes implicated in familial adenomatous polyposis-associated and sporadic hepatoblastomas, respectively. Alterations in other cancer-related molecular pathways have not been reported. We investigated a series of 21 sporadic paraffin-embedded hepatoblastoma cases for mutations in the p53 (exons 5-8) and beta-catenin (exon 3) genes, loss of heterozygosity at APC, microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical expression of beta-catenin and of the two main mismatch repair proteins, MLH1 and MSH2. No loss of heterozygosity at APC was detected. We found mutations in beta-catenin and p53 in 4/21 (19%) and 5/21 (24%) cases respectively, beta-catenin protein accumulation in 14/21 cases (67%), microsatellite instability in 17/21 cases (81%), of which eight resulted positive for high-level of microsatellite instability (in four cases associated with loss of MLH1/MSH2 immunostaining). No correlations between involved molecular pathway(s) and hepatoblastoma histotype(s) emerged. This study confirms that beta-catenin deregulation is involved in sporadic hepatoblastoma and also suggests that mismatch repair defects and p53 mutations contribute to this rare liver cancer. Sporadic hepatoblastoma appears to be molecularly and phenotypically heterogeneous and may reflect different pathways of liver carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据