4.8 Article

The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 D623-D631

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm900

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R33GM070065, R01GM075742, R01GM080746] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM080746, GM75742, R01 GM075742, R33 GM070065, GM080746, R01 GM075742-05, R01 GM080746-01, R33 GM070065-03, GM70065] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM088849, R01 GM080746, U24 GM077678, GM75742, GM080746, GM077678] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MetaCyc (MetaCyc.org) is a universal database of metabolic pathways and enzymes from all domains of life. The pathways in MetaCyc are curated from the primary scientific literature, and are experimentally determined small-molecule metabolic pathways. Each reaction in a MetaCyc pathway is annotated with one or more well-characterized enzymes. Because MetaCyc contains only experimentally elucidated knowledge, it provides a uniquely high-quality resource for metabolic pathways and enzymes. BioCyc (BioCyc.org) is a collection of more than 350 organism-specific Pathway/Genome Databases (PGDBs). Each BioCyc PGDB contains the predicted metabolic network of one organism, including metabolic pathways, enzymes, metabolites and reactions predicted by the Pathway Tools software using MetaCyc as a reference database. BioCyc PGDBs also contain predicted operons and predicted pathway hole fillerspredictions of which enzymes may catalyze pathway reactions that have not been assigned to an enzyme. The BioCyc website offers many tools for computational analysis of PGDBs, including comparative analysis and analysis of omics data in a pathway context. The BioCyc PGDBs generated by SRI are offered for adoption by any interested party for the ongoing integration of metabolic and genome-related information about an organism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据