4.7 Article

Evaluation of a fully automated serum assay for total N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen in postmenopausal osteoporosis

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 188-196

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.094953

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Biochemical markers of bone turnover can provide prognostic information about the risk of fracture and may be useful for monitoring efficacy of antiresorptive and anabolic therapy in osteoporosis. We evaluated the performance of a fully automated assay for serum total N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), a marker of bone formation. METHODS: Serum P1NP was measured on the Elecsys 2010 automated analyzer (Roche) in 230 healthy premenopausal women, age 30-49 years, 179 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis participating in the previously published I year randomized Parathyroid Hormone and Alendronate for Osteoporosis study of full-length parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-84, >100 mu g/day subcutaneously; n=119) or oral alendronate 10 mg/day (n=60), and 64 healthy men, age 40 to 65 years. RESULTS: The within-run and between-run (total) imprecision (CVs) were <= 1.7% (n=20) and 4.4% (n=15), respectively. The median within-person variability of results (3 measurements over 3 months in 15 postmenopausal women) was 7.2%, resulting in a least significant change (LSC) value of 20%. Serum PINP concentrations were 74% (P<0.0001) higher in postmenopausal women than in premenopausal controls. After 3 months of treatment, 83% and 88% of patients treated with PTH 1-84 and alendronate, respectively, demonstrated changes of serum P1NP that exceeded the LSC. CONCLUSION: The automated assay for serum total P1NP is precise and sensitive enough to detect changes that exceed the LSC in a majority of postmenopausal women after 3 months of treatment with PTH 1-84 or alendronate. Because of its convenience and high throughput, this bone formation marker may be useful for the monitoring of patients with osteoporosis (C) 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据