4.4 Article

Gene expression profiling of negative-pressure-treated skin graft donor site wounds

期刊

BURNS
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 687-693

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.09.014

关键词

Wound healing; Gene expression; Epidermis; Dermis

资金

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES), Regenerative Active Matrix (RAM) [40102/08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is Widely used to improve skin wound healing. Although NPWT has been studied as a treatment for wound closure and healing, the molecular mechanisms explaining its therapeutic effects remain unclear. To investigate the effect of NPWT on gene expression, and to discover the genes most dominantly responding to this treatment during skin wound healing, we applied negative pressure on split-thickness skin graft donor sites from the first postoperative day (POD) to the seventh POD. Biopsies were collected from 4 NPWT-treated and 2 control patients. Two biopsy samples were taken from each patient: one from intact skin before graft harvesting, and one on the seventh POD from the donor site wound. Genome-wide microarrays were performed on all samples. Gene expression changes on the seventh POD were compared between NPWT and control patients, and were analyzed for statistical significance. In addition, we analyzed wound exudates for volume, and for concentrations of leukocytes, erythrocytes, and haemoglobin. NPWT induced major changes in gene expression during healing. These changes ranged from 10-fold induction to 27-fold suppression. The genes most induced were associated with cell proliferation and inflammation, and the most down-regulated genes were linked to epidermal differentiation. Our results provide the first insight into the molecular mechanisms behind NPWT, and suggest that NPWT enhances specific inflammatory gene expression at the acute phase associated with epithelial migration and wound healing. However, its continued use may inhibit epithelial differentiation. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据