4.6 Article

Evidence does not support clinical screening of literacy

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 100-102

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0447-2

关键词

literacy; health literacy; screening; clinical care; communication; patient

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH [K01EH000067] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCEH CDC HHS [K01 EH000067, 1 K01 EH000067-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limited health literacy is a significant risk factor for adverse health outcomes. Despite controversy, many health care professionals have called for routine clinical screening of patients' literacy skills. Whereas brief literacy screening tools exist that with further evaluation could potentially be used to detect limited literacy in clinical settings, no screening program for limited literacy has been shown to be effective. Yet there is a noted potential for harm. in the form of shame and alienation, which might be induced through clinical screening. There is fair evidence to suggest that possible harm outweighs any current benefits: therefore, clinical screening for literacy should not be recommended at this time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据