4.7 Article

Resveratrol modulates phagocytosis of bacteria through an NF-kappa B-dependent gene program

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 121-127

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00210-07

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many studies have shown that the pharmacological effects of resveratrol, a phytoalexin polyphenolic compound, include protective effects against cancer and inflammation as well as enhancement of stress resistance. In this study, we examined whether resveratrol affected the phagocytosis of bacteria by macrophages and the activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B after stimulation with or without the ligand FSL-1 for Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2). Phagocytosis of Escherichia coli and of Staphylococcus aureus by THP-1 cells and RAW264.7 cells was inhibited by resveratrol in a dose-dependent manner regardless of stimulation with FSL-1. The NF-kappa B activity in HEK293 cells stably expressing TLR2 was also inhibited by resveratrol after stimulation with FSL-1. Resveratrol also inhibited both the translocation of p65 of NF-kappa B into nuclei in the transfectant and tumor necrosis factor alpha production by THP-1 cells or RAW264.7 cells. It has recently been reported that TLR-mediated signaling pathways lead to the upregulation of mRNAs of phagocytic receptors, including scavenger receptors and C-type lectin receptors. This study also demonstrated that FSL-1 induced the upregulation of mRNAs of phagocytic receptors such as macrophage scavenger receptor-1, CD36, DC-SIGN, and Dectin-1 and that the FSL-1-induced upregulation of their mRNAs was inhibited by resveratrol. In addition, it was found that the expression of DC-SIGN in HEK293 cells stably expressing DC-SIGN was reduced by resveratrol and that the phagocytic activity was significantly inhibited by resveratrol. Thus, this study suggests that resveratrol inhibited bacterial phagocytosis by macrophages by downregulating the expression of phagocytic receptors and NF-kappa B activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据