4.5 Article

Estimating health expenditure shares from household surveys

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
卷 91, 期 7, 页码 519-524

出版社

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.12.115535

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To quantify the effects of household expenditure survey characteristics on the estimated share of a household's expenditure devoted to health. Methods A search was conducted for all country surveys reporting data on health expenditure and total household expenditure. Data on total expenditure and health expenditure were extracted from the surveys to generate the health expenditure share (i.e. fraction of the household expenditure devoted to health). To do this the authors relied on survey microdata or survey reports to calculate the health expenditure share for the particular instrument involved. Health expenditure share was modelled as a function of the survey's recall period, the number of health expenditure items, the number of total expenditure items, he data collection method and the placement of the health module within the survey. Data exists across space and time, so fixed effects for territory and year were included as well. The model was estimated by means of ordinary least squares regression with clustered standard errors. Findings A one-unit increase in the number of health expenditure questions was accompanied by a 1% increase in the estimated health expenditure share. A one-unit increase in the number of non-health expenditure questions resulted in a 0.2% decrease in the estimated share. Increasing the recall period by one month was accompanied by a 6% decrease in the health expenditure share. Conclusion The characteristics of a survey instrument examined in the study affect the estimate of the health expenditure share. Those characteristics need to be accounted for when comparing results across surveys Within a territory and, ultimately, across territories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据