4.5 Article

The elusive definition of pandemic influenza

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
卷 89, 期 7, 页码 532-538

出版社

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.086173

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hugh Hampton Young Memorial Fellowship committee at MIT
  2. UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There has been considerable controversy over the past year, particularly in Europe, over whether the World Health Organization (WHO) changed its definition of pandemic influenza in 2009. after novel H1N1 influenza was identified. Some have argued that not only was the definition changed, but that it was done to pave the way for declaring a pandemic. Others claim that the-definition was never changed and that this allegation is completely unfounded. Such polarized views have hampered our ability to draw important conclusions. This impasse, combined with concerns over potential conflicts of interest and doubts about the proportionality of the response to the H1N1 influenza outbreak, has undermined the public trust in health officials and our collective capacity to effectively respond to future disease threats. WHO did not change its definition of pandemic influenza for the simple reason that it has never formally defined pandemic influenza. While WHO has put forth many descriptions of pandemic influenza, it has never established a formal definition and the criteria for declaring a pandemic caused by the H1N1 virus derived from pandemic phase definitions, not from a definition of pandemic influenza. The fact that despite ten years of pandemic preparedness activities no formal definition of pandemic influenza has been formulated reveals important underlying assumptions about the nature of this infectious disease. In particular, the limitations of virus-centric approaches merit further attention and should inform ongoing efforts to learn lessons that will guide-the response to future outbreaks of novel infectious diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据