4.5 Article

Professional assistance during birth and maternal mortality in two Indonesian districts

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
卷 87, 期 6, 页码 416-423

出版社

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.08.051581

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Department for International Development
  3. European Commission
  4. USAID

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To examine determinants of maternal mortality and assess the effect of programmes aimed at increasing the number of births attended by health professionals in two districts in West Java, Indonesia. Methods We used informant networks to characterize all maternal deaths, and a capture-recapture method to estimate the total number of maternal deaths. Through a survey of recent births we counted all midwives practising in the two study districts. We used case-control analysis to examine determinants of maternal mortality, and cohort analysis to estimate overall maternal mortality ratios. Findings The overall maternal mortality ratio was 435 per 100 000 live births (95% confidence interval, CI: 376-498). Only 33% of women gave birth with assistance from a health professional, and among them, mortality was extremely high for those in the lowest wealth quartile range (2303 per 100 000) and remained very high for those in the lower middle and upper middle quartile ranges (1218 and 778 per 100 000, respectively). This is perhaps because the women, especially poor ones, may have sought help only once a serious complication had arisen. Conclusion Achieving equitable coverage of all births by health professionals is still a distant goal in Indonesia, but even among women who receive professional care, maternal mortality ratios remain surprisingly high. This may reflect the limitations of home-based care. Phased introduction of fee exemption and transport incentives to enable all women to access skilled delivery care in health centres and emergency care in hospitals may be a feasible; sustainable way to reduce Indonesia's maternal mortality ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据