4.5 Article

Beyond fragmentation and towards universal coverage: insights from Ghana, South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
卷 86, 期 11, 页码 871-876

出版社

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.08.053413

关键词

-

资金

  1. IDRC [103457]
  2. European Commission [32289]
  3. South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The World Health Assembly of 2005 called for all health systems to move towards universal coverage, defined as access to adequate health care for all at an affordable price. A crucial aspect in achieving universal coverage is the extent to which there are income and risk cross-subsidies in health systems. Yet this aspect appears to be ignored in many of the policy prescriptions directed at low- and middle-income countries, often resulting in high degrees of health system fragmentation. The aim of this paper is to explore the extent of fragmentation within the health systems of three African countries (Ghana, South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania). Using a framework for analysing health-care financing in terms of its key functions, we describe how fragmentation has developed, how each country has attempted to address the arising equity challenges and what remains to be done to promote universal coverage. The analysis suggests that South Africa has made the least progress in,addressing fragmentation, while Ghana appears to be pursuing a universal coverage policy in a more coherent way. To achieve universal coverage, health systems must reduce their reliance on out-of-pocket payments, maximize the size of risk pools, and resource allocation mechanisms must be put in place to either equalize risks between individual insurance schemes or equitably allocate general tax (and donor) funds. Ultimately, there needs to be greater integration of financing mechanisms to promote universal cover with strong income and risk cross-subsidies in the overall health system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据