4.2 Article

Vertical perturbations of human gait: organisation and adaptation of leg muscle responses

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 186, 期 1, 页码 123-130

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1215-6

关键词

locomotion; body weight support (BWS); loading perturbation (LP); unloading perturbation (UP); loading response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the last several years, evidence has arisen that the neuronal control of human locomotion depends on feedback from load receptors. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects and the course of sudden and unexpected changes in body load (vertical perturbations) on leg muscle activity patterns during walking on a treadmill. Twenty-two healthy subjects walking with 25% body weight support (BWS) were repetitively and randomly loaded to 5% or unloaded to 45% BWS during left mid-stance. At the new level of BWS, the subjects performed 3-11 steps before returning to 25% BWS (base level). EMG activity of upper and lower leg muscles was recorded from both sides. The bilateral leg muscle activity pattern changed following perturbations in the lower leg muscles and the net effect of the vertical perturbations showed onset latencies with a range of 90-105 ms. Body loading enhanced while unloading diminished the magnitude of ipsilateral extensor EMG amplitude, compared to walking at base level. Contralateral leg flexor burst activity was shortened following loading and prolonged following unloading perturbation while flexor EMG amplitude was unchanged. A general decrease in EMG amplitudes occurred during the course of the experiment. This is assumed to be due to adaptation. Only the muscles directly activated by the perturbations did not significantly change EMG amplitude. This is assumed to be due to the required compensation of the perturbations by polysynaptic spinal reflexes released following the perturbations. The findings underline the importance of load receptor input for the control of locomotion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据