4.4 Article

Using Surface Creep Rate to Infer Fraction Locked for Sections of the San Andreas Fault System in Northern California from Alignment Array and GPS Data

期刊

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120140117

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program funded [9939-0KR02 (USGS)]
  2. San Francisco State University [SFSU] [G10AC00139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface creep rate, observed along five branches of the dextral San Andreas fault system in northern California, varies considerably from one section to the next, indicating that so too may the depth at which the faults are locked. We model locking on 29 fault sections using each section's mean long-term creep rate and the consensus values of fault width and geologic slip rate. Surface creep rate observations from 111 short- range alignment and trilateration arrays and 48 near- fault, Global Positioning System station pairs are used to estimate depth of creep, assuming an elastic half- space model and adjusting depth of creep iteratively by trial and error to match the creep observations along fault sections. Fault sections are delineated either by geometric discontinuities between them or by distinctly different creeping behaviors. We remove transient rate changes associated with five large (M = 5: 5) regional earthquakes. Estimates of fraction locked, the ratio of moment accumulation rate to loading rate, on each section of the fault system provide a uniform means to inform source parameters relevant to seismic- hazard assessment. From its mean creep rates, we infer the main branch (the San Andreas fault) ranges from only 20% +/- 10% locked on its central creeping section to 99%-100% on the north coast. From mean accumulation rates, we infer that four urban faults appear to have accumulated enough seismic moment to produce major earthquakes: the northern Calaveras (M 6.8), Hayward (M 6.8), Rodgers Creek (M 7.1), and Green Valley (M 7.1). The latter three faults are nearing or past their mean recurrence interval.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据