4.4 Article

A Method and Example of Seismically Imaging Near-Surface Fault Zones in Geologically Complex Areas Using VP, VS, and their Ratios

期刊

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120130294

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earthquake Hazards Program
  2. SFPUC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The determination of near-surface (vadose zone and slightly below) fault locations and geometries is important because assessment of ground rupture, strong shaking, geologic slip rates, and rupture histories occurs at shallow depths. However, seismic imaging of fault zones at shallow depths can be difficult due to near-surface complexities, such as weathering, groundwater saturation, massive (nonlayered) rocks, and vertically layered strata. Combined P- and S-wave seismic-refraction tomography data can overcome many of the near-surface, fault-zone seismic-imaging problems because of differences in the responses of elastic (bulk and shear) moduli of P and S waves to shallow-depth, fault-zone properties. We show that high-resolution refraction tomography images of P- to S-wave velocity ratios (V-P/V-S) can reliably identify near-surface faults. We demonstrate this method using tomography images of the San Andreas fault (SAF) surface-rupture zone associated with the 18 April 1906 similar to M 7.9 San Francisco earthquake on the San Francisco peninsula in California. There, the SAF cuts through Franciscan melange, which consists of an incoherent assemblage of greywacke, chert, greenstone, and serpentinite. A near-vertical zone (similar to 75 degrees northeast dip) of high P-wave velocities (up to 3000 m/s), low S-wave velocities (similar to 150-600 m/s), high V-P/V-S ratios (4-8.8), and high Poisson's ratios (0.44-0.49) characterizes the main surface-rupture zone to a depth of about 20 m and is consistent with nearby trench observations. We suggest that the combined V-P/V-S imaging approach can reliably identify most near-surface fault zones in locations where many other seismic methods cannot be applied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据