4.4 Article

Changes in plasma fatty acid composition after intake of a standardised breakfast in prepubertal obese children

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 99, 期 4, 页码 909-917

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507831722

关键词

obese children; plasma fatty acids; plasma lipid fractions; prepubertal stage; postprandial period

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obese patients typically show a pattern of dyslipidaemia and changes in plasma fatty acid composition reflecting abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism and dietary habits. Animals and obese adults have been widely studied; however, contradictory results have been published in children. The objective was to assess changes in plasma fatty acid composition in total plasma lipids and plasma lipid fractions in obese prepubertal children compared with those of normal weight and to evaluate changes in postprandial plasma fatty acids during a 3 h period after intake of a standardised breakfast. The study was a case-control study with thirty-four obese and twenty normal-weight prepubertal children (Tanner 1). Anthropometric and metabolic variables and fatty acid concentrations were measured in plasma and its fractions. Liquid chromatography was used to separate lipid fractions and GLC to quantify fatty acids. Plasma total fatty acids (TFA), SFA, MUFA and PUFA concentrations were higher in obese than in control children. Except for 18:0, 18: 3n-3, 20:4n-6 and n-3 PUFA, all fatty acids in TAG were also elevated in the obese group. Fatty acids 16: 1n-7, 18:0, 18: 1n-9, 20: 2n-6, TFA and MUFA significantly decreased between the 2nd and 3rd hour in normal-weight v. obese children. The concentration of 16: 1n-7 was positively and the proportion of 20: 4n-6 inversely associated with a significant increase in risk of obesity. Obese prepubertal children show an altered plasma fatty acid profile and concentrations, mainly related to the TAG fatty acid profile, with a lower clearance of fatty acids v. normal-weight prepubertal children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据